Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Structural Health Monitoring
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

Review Paper: Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure

Peter C. Chang

Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA

Alison Flatau

Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA

S. C. Liu

Sensors Technology, Civil and Mechanical System, National Science Foundation

Increased awareness of the economic and social effects of aging, deterioration and extreme events on civil infrastructure has been accompanied by recognition of the need for advanced structural health monitoring and damage detection tools. Today, these tasks are done by visual inspection and very traditional methods such as the tap test. This labor-intensive task is done at a frequency of less than once every two years for bridges, and on an as-needed basis for other infrastructures such as buildings. Structural health monitoring techniques based on changes in dynamic characteristics have been studied for the last three decades. When the damage is substantial, these methods have some success in determining if damage has occurred. At incipient stages of damage, however, the existing methods are not as successful. A number of new research projects have been funded to improve the damage detection methods including the use of innovative signal processing, new sensors, and control theory. This survey paper highlights these new research directions.

Key Words: structural health monitoring • damage detection • dynamic characteristics • infrastructure

Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 2, No. 3, 257-267 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1475921703036169


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Structural Health MonitoringHome page
K. Liu and G. De Roeck
Damage Detection of Shear Connectors in Composite Bridges
Structural Health Monitoring, September 1, 2009; 8(5): 345 - 356.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Structural Health MonitoringHome page
M. Chandrashekhar and R. Ganguli
Structural Damage Detection Using Modal Curvature and Fuzzy Logic
Structural Health Monitoring, July 1, 2009; 8(4): 267 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Structural Health MonitoringHome page
Haitao Zheng and A. Mita
Localized Damage Detection of Structures Subject to Multiple Ambient Excitations Using Two Distance Measures for Autoregressive Models
Structural Health Monitoring, May 1, 2009; 8(3): 207 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Structural Health MonitoringHome page
M. Maalej, S.F.U. Ahmed, K.S.C. Kuang, and P. Paramasivam
Fiber Optic Sensing for Monitoring Corrosion-Induced Damage
Structural Health Monitoring, June 1, 2004; 3(2): 165 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]