Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Structural Health Monitoring
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Overbey, L.A.
Right arrow Articles by Todd, M.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Analysis of Local State Space Models for Feature Extraction in Structural Health Monitoring

L.A. Overbey

Department of Structural Engineering 0085, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA 92093-0085, USA

M.D. Todd

Department of Structural Engineering 0085, University of California, San Diego La Jolla, CA 92093-0085, USA, mdt{at}ucsd.edu

Error metrics based on nonlinear dynamical predictive models has been implemented earlier to determine discrepancies or nonstationarity in time series caused by external sources, such as noise or filtering. The structural health monitoring (SHM) field has adapted various forms of such prediction error metrics for damage detection. This process usually requires randomly selecting a number of fiducial points on a reconstructed attractor, tracking their time evolutions, and then comparing them to a corresponding set (in a general sense) of points on another attractor. Such an approach has been successful, but it is a process that is globally averaged over the whole data set. However, changes to dynamics resulting from processes such as damage may only noticeably affect small regions within state space if the damage manifests itself locally in time and/or space. In such a case, a generalized selection of points covering the entire attractor may not be able to identify that a dynamical change has taken place. This work examines local dynamics and local dynamical stability and how these concepts relate to prediction error for similarly local regions in phase space. Further, this work considers whether computing features such as prediction error in these local regions can improve the ability to detect changes, including in the presence of additive noise on the output. This work considers a Lorenz-driven three-degree-of-freedom oscillator subject to both simulated linear and nonlinear damage scenarios in the presence of noise, as well as an experimental frame structure subject to bolt preload loss.

Key Words: state space • nonlinear • prediction error • Lyapunov exponents • structural health monitoring • damage detection • local state space

Structural Health Monitoring, Vol. 6, No. 2, 145-172 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1475921706072079


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?